Article information
Article publication date
2024-09-08
Article Page
62–80
Chapter
Arts & Humanities
License
Abstract
In the present day, archival photography of Kazakhstan from the 19th to the early 20th century attracts keen attention from experts and the general public. The history of the interaction between painting and photography, as well as the latter’s use in creating visual art masterpieces of Kazakhstan, have become significant issues in contemporary domestic art studies.
The aim of this article is to comprehend photography as a resource for mythological connotations and the actualization of cultural memory during the formative years of the painting school of Kazakhstan and in the artistic practices of contemporary Kazakh masters. In order to achieve this goal, the objectives of this article are to: 1) consider the use of photography in the visual arts during the Soviet period and its role in reflecting transformations in everyday life and the emergence of new heroes; 2) study photography as a tool in modern artistic practices; 3) identify the features of using photography in the works of contemporary painters.
The primary method of the study lies in art and historical analysis of selected works. To understand the painting of the Stalinist period and the manifestation of the ideological discourse of the era within it, a structural-semiotic method is employed. The examination of the unique ways of the appropriation of archival photographs by contemporary artists into their work as a means of exploring collective trauma has prompted a shift towards postcolonial perspectives in historical knowledge. The significance of photography is explored through the lens of visual inquiry and the exploration of memory, providing insights into the utilization of this medium for capturing the essence of the past. It has been discovered that the interaction between photography and painting is a crucial aspect of the visual culture in Kazakhstan, enabling the examination of this phenomenon at different stages of its artistic development. During the period of totalitarianism, the use of photographs from previous years allowed to make a connection with the fading nature of the past, providing the necessary “tactics” for visualizing the archetypes of national thought in the socialist realist genre of everyday life.
Contemporary visual culture reflects the acknowledgement of the traumatic experience during the Soviet period. Ongoing work on post-memory, based on the appropriation of archival photographs and works of the Soviet photographic school, has become one the approaches to shape public history not tied to mythologizing and ideology, and initiating a process of self-identification. The “return” to photography through the combination of a painted canvas and a photographic frame, as well as process of reconstructing lost cityscapes using old photographs, serves as a basis for preserving cultural memory and reinforcing identification strategies.
Keywords
photography
painting
modern artistic practices
postcolonial
post-memory
self-identification
cultural memory
References
Список источников
Абашин, Сергей. «Власть и фотография: визуальная репрезентация в имперской рамке». Неприкосновенный запас, № 4 (84), 2012, с. 120–138.
Абылхожин, Жулдузбек, и др. Визуальная антропология образов казахстанской культуры XX–XXI вв. Учебное пособие. Алматы, ИД «Жибек Жолы», 2022, 172 с.
Барт, Ролан. Camera lucida. Комментарий к фотографии. Перевод с французского Михаила Рыклина. Москва, Ad Marginem, 1997, 224 с.
Васильева, Екатерина. «Фотография: к проблеме вещи». Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Искусствоведение, т. 12, № 2, 2020, с. 275–294. DOI: 10.21638/spbu15.2022.204.
Прищепова, Валерия. Иллюстративные коллекции по народам Центральной Азии второй половины XIX – начала XX века в собраниях Кунсткамеры. Санкт-Петербург, Наука, 2011, 452 с.
Рыскулова, Наргиза. «"Деколонизация мышления". Как новое поколение Казахстана борется за возрождение своей культуры». BBC News, 20 мая 2023, www.bbc.com/russian/features-65614334. Дата доступа 13 мая 2024.
Саид, Эдвард. Ориентализм. Западные концепции Востока. Перевод с английского Александра Говорунова. Санкт-Петербург, Русский Мiръ, 2006, 640 c.
Серто, Мишель де. Изобретение повседневности. 1. Искусство делать. Перевод с французского Дмитрия Калугина, Натальи Мовниной; научный редактор К. Ермошина. Санкт-Петербург, Издательство Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге, 2013, 330 с.
Ушакин, Сергей. «Обличья обезличивания: портреты без лица и Минская школа постколониальной фотографии». Антропологии, № 1, 2022, с. 77–135. DOI: 10.33876/2782-3423/2022-1/77-135.
Хирш, Марианна. Поколение постпамяти: письмо и визуальная культура после Холокоста. Перевод с английского Николая Эппле, под редакцией Л. Любавиной. Москва, Новое издательство, 2021, 428 с.
Шарипова, Диляра, и Светлана Кобжанова. «Особенности современной истории искусства Казахстана. Взаимодействие живописи и кинематографа». Вестник КазНУ имени аль-Фараби. Серия историческая, т. 102, № 3, 2021, c. 169–177. DOI: 10.26577/JH.2021.v102.i3.17.
Bourdieu, Pierre. Photography: A Middle-brow Art. Oxford, Polity Press, 1998.
Clark, Katerina. The Soviet Novel. History as Ritual. 3rd ed., Bloomington, Indianapolis, Indiana University Press, 2000.
References
Abashin, Sergey. “Vlast’ i fotografiya: vizual’naya reprezentasiya v imperskoy ramke.” [“Power and Photography: Visual Representation in an Imperial Frame.”] Neprikosnovennyy zapas, no. 4 (84), 2012, pp. 120–138. (In Russian)
Abylkhozhin, Zhulduzbek, et al. Vizual’naya antropologiya obrazov kazakhstanskoy kultury XX–XXI vv. Uchebnoe posobie [Visual Anthropology of Images of Kazakhstani Culture of XX–XXI Centuries. Textbook]. Almaty, Zhibek Zholy PH, 2022. (In Russian)
Barthes, Roland. Camera lucida. Kommentariy k fotografii [Camera Lucida. Reflections on the Photography]. Transl. from French by Mikhail Ryklin. Moscow, Ad Marginem, 1997. (In Russian)
Bourdieu, Pierre. Photography: A Middle-brow Art. Oxford, Polity Press, 1998.
Certeau, Michel de. Izobretenie povsednevnosti. 1. Iskusstvo delat’ [L’invention du quotidien. 1. Arts de faire]. Transl. from French by Dmitry Kalugin and Natalya Movnina. St. Petersburg, PH of the St. Petersburg European University, 2013. (In Russian)
Clark, Katerina. The Soviet Novel. History as Ritual. 3rd ed. Bloomington, Indianapolis, Indiana University Press, 2000.
Hirsch, Marianne. Pokolenie postpamyati. Pis’mo i vizual’naya kul’tura posle Kholokosta [The Generation of Postmemory: Writing and Visual Culture After the Holocaust]. Transl. from English by Nikolay Epplee. Moscow, Novoe izdatel’stvo. 2021. (In Russian)
Prischepova, Valeriya. Illustrativnye kollektsii po narodam Tsentralnoy Azii vtoroy poloviny XIX – nachala XX veka v sobraniyakh Kunstkamery [Illustrative Collections on the Central Asian Peoples of the Second Half of the XIX – Early XX Centuries in the Collections of Kunstkamera]. Saint Petersburg, Nauka, 2011. (In Russian)
Ryskulova, Nargiza. “‘Decolonizatsiya myshleniya.’ Kak novoe pokolenie Kazakhstana boretsya za vozrozhdenie svoey kul’tury.” [“‘Decolonisation of Mind.’ How Kazakhstan’s New Generation is Struggling to Restore its Culture.”] BBC News, 20 May 2023, www.bbc.com/russian/features-65614334. Accessed 13 May 2024. (In Russian)
Said, Edward. Orientalizm. Zapadnye kontseptsii Vostoka [Orientalism: Western Concepts of the Orient]. Transl. from English by Aleksandr Govorunov. St. Petersburg, Russkiy Mir, 2006. (In Russian)
Sharipova, Dilyara, and Svetlana Kobzhanova. “Osobennosti sovremennoy istorii iskusstva Kazakhstana. Vzaimodeistvie zhivopisii kinamatografa.” [“Features of the Modern Art History of Kazakhstan. Interaction of painting and Cinema.”] Journal of History, vol. 102, no. 3, 2021, pp. 169–77. DOI: 10.26577/JH.2021.v102.i3.17. (In Russian)
Ushakin, Sergey. “Oblich’ya obezlichivaniya: portrety bez litsa i minskaya shkola postcolonial’noy fotografii.” [“Figures of Depersonalization: Portraits without a Face and the Minsk School of Postcolonial Photography.”] Antropologies, no. 1, 2021, pp. 77–135. DOI: 10.33876/2782-3423/2022-1/77-135. (In Russian)